no one deals like we do!

Home // Big Brother News // Civil Rights Groups Alarmed But Eric Holder defends the government’s use of “lethal force,” against American citizens

Civil Rights Groups Alarmed But Eric Holder defends the government’s use of “lethal force,” against American citizens

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

Civil Rights Groups Alarmed But Eric Holder defends the government’s use of “lethal force,” against American citizens….

Official defends ‘lethal force’ against US citizens

By Staff Reporter
AFP American Edition

Mar 05, 2012 19:13 EST

US Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday defended the government’s use of “lethal force,” even against American citizens abroad, as part of the effort to protect the nation against terror attacks.

Call Now: 877-681-3921

The speech marked the first time a senior US official has publicly justified in legal terms the drone attacks that are believed to have killed at least three US citizens on foreign soil in recent months, including key Al-Qaeda figure Anwar al-Awlaqi.

“Given the nature of how terrorists act and where they tend to hide, it may not always be feasible to capture a United States citizen terrorist who presents an imminent threat of violent attack,” Holder said in a speech at a law school in Chicago.

“In that case, our government has the clear authority to defend the United States with lethal force.”

Holder said there were circumstances under which “an operation using lethal force in a foreign country, targeted against a US citizen who is a senior operational leader of Al-Qaeda or associated forces, and who is actively engaged in planning to kill Americans, would be lawful.”

Such circumstances included that a thorough review had determined the individual posed “an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States” and that “capture is not feasible.”

Thirdly, the “operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles,” Holder told the audience at the Northwestern University School of Law.

“Some have called such operations ‘assassinations.’ They are not… assassinations are unlawful killings,” Holder said.

Microsoft-Badge a-googleplay
Amazon-preorder

“Our legal authority is not limited to the battlefield in Afghanistan… We are at war with a stateless enemy, prone to shifting operations from country to country,” he added.

“Our government has both a responsibility and a right to protect this nation and its people from such threats.”

Civil rights groups have cried foul since the killing of Awlaqi in Yemen in September in a US raid.

Some argued it was illegal for the US military to kill an American citizen on the battlefield, following no attempt to indict him.

US intelligence officials believed Awlaqi was linked to a US army major charged with shooting dead 13 people in 2009 in Fort Hood, Texas, and to a Nigerian student accused of trying to blow up a US airliner on December 25, 2009.

President Barack Obama said in September that Awlaqi’s killing was a “major blow” to Al-Qaeda’s Yemeni branch, and marked “another significant milestone in the broader effort to defeat Al-Qaeda and its affiliates.”

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) last month filed a lawsuit seeking the release of documents authorizing targeted drone strikes, such as the one on Awlaqi.

US citizen Samir Khan was killed in the same attack on Awlaqi, and Awlaqi’s US-born teenage son was killed in October in a separate suspected US air strike in Yemen.

Source: AFP American Edition

Top Trending News From The Web
Posted in Big Brother News, Latest News, News On The Edge, News Updates, Opinion, Politics and tagged as , , , , , ,